Anti-Evil
Good often fails to act as an anti-evil,
yet evil always acts as an anti-good.
Think about it. It's what allows evil to prevail so easily.
But good prevails evil in general.
Update:
Hi guys, Thanks for your wonderful comments. My blog entry was about how a 'good' spiritual buddist monk or priest would not be able to stop a single Nazi officer. Yet a simple criminal with a gun could hurt as many good people as he wanted.
My comments are simply discussing the power of Good versus the power of Evil.
Of course evil will always come out of supposed acts of Good (whatever degree you determine it), and good will always result from some acts of evil (it's the complexity of the world).
The power of Evil in a person, will always act as an anti-good. In that it will take good, or a good moment away.
But Good, a good person, a good priest, throughout his course of duties, cannot stop a criminal from committing evil (obviously I am talking in extremes here).
Some use this logic as the basis for the 'Just War'.
But the debate lingers on in the battle between Good and Evil.
(I'm a Zoroastrian, the religion of the ancient prophet, Zarathusthra, who discovered the concept of Good Versus Evil, over 3,500 years ago)